Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
That's a faith claim right there. Do you know how faith claims are distinguished from rational claims? The latter but not the former are supported by evidence and/or argument. You have no evidence or arguments to show that his years of reading were adequate to establish the accuracy of his claims. Therefore it is a faith claim (on your part) that this was the case.
|
The fact that you say he has no argument or support for his claims is utterly ridiculous Spacemonkey. I realize you don't consider a careful description based on astute observation as good enough, even though he gives very convincing evidence for his claims. If you don't want to investigate the book any further, it's okay with me. You're off the hook. |
You've done it again. I said that
you had no evidence or arguments for
your claim, and you've responded as if I said
Lessans had no evidence or arguments for
his claim. Which part of your brain broke to make you keep doing this?
If it is so ridiculous of me to say that he didn't adequately support his claims, then show me the arguments or support he provided for his listed presuppositions. We both know you can't do it.