Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
Hey, peacegirl, do you know where the word "radio" comes from? No? I'll tell you. It's a neologism for "radiating light." And guess what? Radio light from Mars is delayed, in accordance with c in vacuo, which means real-time seeing is false.
|
Are you trying to convince me that you're right, or yourself?  |
Excuse me? I asked you a question. If real-time seeing is true, why is radio light from Mars to Earth delayed by between 4 and 20 minutes, depending on the time of year? The distance that light must traverse from Mars to Earth is different depending on the time of year, because sometimes Mars is farther away from Earth than at other times.
Your answer, please?
 |
What are you getting at? I realize that light travels and therefore it's delayed, but what does this have to do with how the brain and eyes work? |
If real-time seeing were true, you little fool, then we would receive radio messages (light) from Mars
instantaneously. But, we don't.
If real-time seeing were true, then, in the visible spectrum, where Mars
appears to be in the sky, would be where it
actually is. If THAT were the case, then, when we send rockets to Mars, we would calculate the trajectory according to where Mars
appears to be in the sky, But,
we don't do that, as has been explained to your sorry ass
ad nauseum.
If real-time seeing is true, why does NASA calculate trajectories to Mars according to delayed-time seeing, peacegirl?