Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I get what you're saying, but it doesn't apply to the efferent account. If it's true that we see in real time, it is still light striking the canvas, but it's not traveling because the eye is seeing a mirror image of what exists, which takes no time.
|
But you can't explain how it works. How does the nonabsorbed light which just struck an object get to be instantaneously at distant eyes or cameras? That is teleportation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
It's not a strawman. The image that IS SEEN is seen in real time, because of how the eyes work. Light travels at 186,000 miles a second. There is no conflict with these two separate accounts.
|
It is a strawman to say that science thinks images travel or get reflected. It tells us nothing to say "because of how the eyes work" when you can't tell us how you think the eyes work. And you deny that the nonabsorbed light travels at 186,000 miles a second. You instead claim both that "nothing happens" to it, and that it is instantly at distant eyes and/or cameras, where it stays stationary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Nothing happens to the non-absorbed light. It is there at the eye which reveals the object, it doesn't bring anything to the eye.
|
No-one claims it
brings anything to the eye. It brings only itself. And it is contradictory to say that this non-absorbed light at the object instantaneously teleports itself to distant eyes and/or cameras
and that nothing happens to it. If nothing happened to it, then it would still be there were it was at the surface of the object it just struck.