Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Every single circumstance means that there should be no exceptions if the eyes are a sense organ.
|
Which is what makes your claim utterly and mind-bogglingly stupid. You are saying that if afferent vision is true, then we should always
and without exception see planes before we hear them... even if we have poor vision, are looking in the wrong direction, or if the airplane is occluded by clouds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
But there are exceptions, and they are very obvious to the astute observer. The plane is too small to be resolved indicates that the plane is out of visual range. Due to its small size, the image won't show up on our retinas. If we use a telescope, we can see it because it magnifies its size to where its within our field of view and therefore it does show up on our retinas.
|
Yes, this is the resolution explanation. It is the explanation provided by AFFERENT VISION and which works and makes sense for AFFERENT VISION only. It is an explanation that relies upon the
dispersion of traveling light. It is NOT an explanation that makes any sense at all on the hypothesis of efferent vision. It is also something you clearly do not understand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Use whatever term you want, the fact remains that light should be traveling over long distances to reach our eye in nano-seconds, but this doesn't occur.
|
Yes it does. You are making shit up again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
If the plane is too far away (out of our visual field) or the light the plane is reflecting is too dim from where we are, we won't see it because the conditions that would allow us to see it are not present.
|
Well, duh! Who's disagreeing with that? Obviously things that cannot be seen will not be seen. Your point?
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
No, it actually doesn't work perfectly under regular afferent vision.
|
Oh really? Do go on. Explain why the resolution/dispersion explanation does not work for afferent vision. Please also explain how it allegedly
does work for efferent vision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
These are not invented facts.
|
Of course they are. You blatantly invented your claim that we typically can hear airplanes before we can see them. That was grade A invented ignorant bullshit.