Quote:
|
without even one solid refutation that proves him wrong
|
And you've not given us a single rational reason to believe he was even possibly right.
When asked for evidence, you whine and tell people to read the book, because you're a weasel.
Why not post the excerpts you think provide the evidence being asked for? What reason, other than "Lessans said so" is there to believe conscience works as he assumed it does? What reason, other than Lessans probably mistaken ideas about dog and infant sight, and his complete misunderstanding of the physics of light, is there to believe sight is efferent?
Quote:
|
Telling me he's wrong is not good enough.
|
Telling us he was exceptionally perceptive and read a lot of books is not good enough reason to assume he was anything but a crackpot. What else do you have?