Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger
How 'bout some of the alleged evidence to support his claim that the eye contains no afferent nerve endings that are contacted by light?
I'd love to see that evidence!
|
He didn't say anything to that effect. He never disputed that light strikes the optic nerve (or retina), so I'm not sure where you get this idea. The only thing he argued was that this light carries messages to the brain that can be interpreted as an image. |
He said it flat out, in those exact words. We posted the quote multiple times just last week. And you say you are not a weasel? You are
totally fucking lying right here!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lessans
The same holds true for anything that makes direct contact with an afferent nerve ending, but this is far from the case with the eyes because there is no similar afferent nerve ending in this organ.
|