11-02-2012, 12:54 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
From last May
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
|
Lessans said there are no afferent structures in the eye proper, not the brain proper.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger
The eye most-definitely does contain afferent neurons -- millions of them.
|
What he meant is that the brain does not receive, decode, or interpret images from signals sent by the optic nerve. I guess he had no other way to express it. This was why he said the eyes don't have afferent nerve endings and why the eyes can't be defined as a sense organ. |
He did not say what he meant then, and what he did say was demonstrably wrong. Not unlike his molecules of light. Are you going to change his incorrect statement about no afferent structures like you changed molecules to photons? |
|