[Clutch Munny]

I suspect that what will meet with only some approval is the relatively succinct way in which I pointed out the following: I actually explicitly debunked the link you cited; you ignored that debunking, and instead quoted an altogether different post as an illegitimate critique of the link.

Seriously, how do you make this shit up? Do you roll dice, or consciously consider what would be the weirdest confabulation to produce? Was my post also an illegitimate criticism of California Tanker? Was it also a perfect example of the view that it's immoral to be moral? Once that three-legged squirrel starts limping around the broken wheel in your head, mick, who the fuck knows?

In any case, I doubt this will meet with very much approval, for the simple reason that I think most people are heartily sick of your pathologies, and are frustrated when others occasionally encourage your fixations by taking the bait. For that, I do apologize.