Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You're missing the fact that, in the efferent account, non-absorbed light, which indicates the color of the object, cannot show photons on the retina without the object present.
That is true but, once again, without the object present, there would be no nonabsorbed light present at the retina from which an image could be made out.
|
Here is where the efferent model fails, it has been tested, experiments have been done, and the emperical data is in, light reflects and is independent of the object it has reflected from. Efferent vision fails.
This is where Lessans has failed, I often tell someone that in order to improve or correct something, they must first learn as much about it as possible, and only then are they competent to change or correct. Lessans was totally ignorant about light and vision, as well as several subjects that he felt he could school the world and correct the errors, where in fact there were no errors.