Quote:
Originally Posted by thedoc
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
No LadyShea. The only thing I'm refuting is that non-absorbed light (the partial light spectrum) travels independent of the object itself. As long as the non-absorbed photons are at the retina, the object is within the optic range. Once we can no longer see the object because it is too distant, only white light will remain. This means that if the object or event is no longer present, and we were sitting on the star Rigel, the image of Columbus discovering America (as an example) would never show up on the retina some million light years later.
|
And this is wrong according to the known laws of physics, (which you claim your ideas do not violate). Light, once reflected does travel independent of the object and will continue to travel whether the object exists or not. Also light that is a partial spectrum (say one particular color), does not change or merge back into white light, it continues as that particular color till it strikes some other object (another known law of physics). Your refutation has failed, as has been demonstrated for many years, by established science. |
No it hasn't thedoc. It's just your belief because of the long tenure of an established theory that has graduated into fact. All you're doing is repeating the same old theory and accepting that I must be wrong. That's exactly what you have done with his first discovery. You don't think for yourself; you don't even read for yourself. You just follow the leader.