[Spacemonkey]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Spacemonkey, nothing I say is going to change your mind about afferent vision. So why are you pressing me?

You said we would discuss it. Why are you reneging?

My questions have nothing to do with afferent vision, and address only your claims about efferent vision. You have made specific claims about the photon at the retina. I'm asking you to work with me to see whether or not those claims are plausible. Why are you refusing to co-operate?

You've defended efferent vision by claiming that at 12:00 when the Sun is first ignited there will be photons at the retina on Earth which were previously located at the surface of the Sun. If there is no time at which these photons could have been plausibly located there then your claims must be false. This is why I am asking you to select a time at which these photons could have been at the Sun.

Please answer. I would much rather discuss this than your mental state.