Please address this point
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
YOU are making false accusations that he excluded compatibilism arbitrarily.
|
Is compatibilism included in Lessans explanations or "proof" or argument regarding the provability of determinism? I don't see it in the passage I quoted above. If not, then it was excluded, right? If it was excluded, it was done so at Lessans discretion and without a supporting statement as to why it was excluded, which is arbitrary.
So how is my charge of the false dilemma fallacy, or accusing him of excluding compatibilism arbitrarily, incorrect or "false" as you say?