View Single Post
  #27703  
Old 06-21-2013, 01:34 AM
thedoc's Avatar
thedoc thedoc is offline
I'm Deplorable.
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: XMMCCCXCVI
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Light is emitted at different points in time depending on how old a star is, but this is not as important as how large and bright a star is, in order for us to see it. Olber's paradox says that we don't see all stars at once because some are from so long ago that the light hasn't reached us yet. There are a few more, but none of these theories are related to the efferent model.
If efferent vision is correct and we see the object and don't need to wait for the light, we should see the object whether the light has arrived or not. We are supposed to be able to see the Sun before the light arrives, the stars are just Suns that are farther away. If we need to wait for the light to signal the brain to look out and see what is there to be seen, that contradicts what Lessans said about the Sun being turned on at noon. There were no photons at the eye to signal the brain to look for the sun, yet he claimed that we could see the Sun instantly. So do the photons stimulate the brain to look for the object, or can we see the object instantly, before the photons arrive?
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Angakuk (06-21-2013)
 
Page generated in 0.20657 seconds with 10 queries