Quote:
|
The fact that he wasn't a scientist in the formal sense (you know, having the right credentials) does not make this knowledge unscientific.
|
That would be true, if that was the problem. The problem is that he was not a scientist in any sense at all. The ideas in the book are
deeply unscientific - nothing more than a bunch of vaguely connected faith-claims and presuppositions held together by confused language and egotism.