Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
The fact that objects behind it are affected is because light refracts. I never said it didn't.
|
Refraction is a function of light traveling, as is dispersion. So light travels from the object in efferent vision? |
I never said light doesn't refract or disperse. |
You've said it doesn't travel away from the object. Refraction and dispersion both happen to traveling light, only. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
This refraction causes a physical change in the atmosphere
|
No, it doesn't. The atmosphere is not changed at all. The traveling light changes direction slightly. |
That's what I meant. Thanks for clarifying. |
What do you mean that's what you meant? Why didn't you say what you meant, instead of stating some crazy shit about the atmosphere physically changing?
What about the actual point I made? You've said light doesn't travel away from the object. Refraction and dispersion both happen to
traveling light, only. So are they still a part of your model? If so, how?
Also, why have you dropped your line of reasoning about organized light?