Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Nothing regarding his claim about the eyes has anything to do with his other discoveries. It is not the cornerstone principle, which just goes to show me how ignorant you really are.
|
You lie again or you do not understand the book. His claims about the eye relate to his claims about projecting words of meaning onto the substance of the world. Words like beautiful, which he claims, then denote that some other must be ugly. Total nonsense as that one thing is beautiful, only denotes that something else is less beautiful, but nowhere does it require that some other thing be ugly. One of Lessans false dichotomy that he was so fond of using throughout the book.