Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
So the current rates of autism are the equivalent, in your mind, to 2.4 million measles deaths? You can say that, but you can't even say whether you believe autism rates are decreasing, increasing, or staying steady?
|
I didn't say that LadyShea. |
Adam asked you
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Adam
So, that's approximately 2.4 million lives saved per year, and that's just for measles. Unless the "extent of the damage" is equivalent to 2.4 million people dying every year, then that's an easy net win for vaccination and, again, I'm only using the numbers from a single disease.
Are there 2.4 million people out there dying every year that you think you can pin on vaccination?
|
You responded with an rant titled WHY AUTISM WILL NEVER BE SOLVED WITHIN THE CURRENT MEDICAL PARADIGM
So what were you actually saying then? |
I responded that way because number one, it's been reported that children get measles even after they have been vaccinated. Secondly, there is a bigger issue here as to whether these shots cause a worse problem than the disease itself if a child becomes developmentally delayed or worse.
http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Measles.aspx |
Weasel. Although measles is still a top 5 killer of children worldwide, there are 2.4 million fewer measles death now than there were before vaccinations.
The question to you is this: is the "extent of the damage" from vaccines equivalent to 2.4 million people dying every year?
Is your answer that the possibility that vaccines might cause developmental delays is equivalent to 2.4 million deaths from measles? Do those equal out in your mind? |
Your stats are way off. |
Which stats? Are you saying the stats on worldwide measles deaths are way off? You can prove that with actual documentation, right?