Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Most of the time the patient is right when diagnosing their own condition.
|
 ? You can back that opinion up I suppose?
Quote:
|
This still does not relate the accurate observation that the source of the extreme behavioral changes came from the vaccine, just like certain people may have a bad reaction to a medicine, and they immediately say stop taking the medicine because you had a reaction.
|
DO you understand what post hoc ergo propter hoc even means or why it is problematic? |
Now I do.
Noun, 1. post hoc ergo propter hoc - the logical fallacy of believing that temporal succession implies a causal relation. post hoc · logical fallacy - a fallacy in ...
Why couldn't you just say logical fallacy? It would have been so much easier?
If I eat dinner and am full, you can logically conclude that eating causes fullness. Are you telling me that an immediate reaction to something that was never before felt does not come from that something? Maybe one in a million there would be no causal connection, but most people would safely say with 100% accuracy that food ingested and a full feeling five minutes later would be due to the food and I don't have to do an empirical study to prove it.