[quote=Vivisectus;1175307]
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Well, even if I hadn't already read the book (you put most of it online, remember? Except for the part about not-reincarnation?) there is little point, as i have just proven beyond a shadow of a doubt (to lessanese standards, anyway) that it will never take off. If it never takes off, there's no point reading about a revolution that will never happen now is there?
Or does the audiobook include that part?
|
Yes it does Vivisectus. And you cannot tell me that reading this major work could be understood in a perusal or a quick skim. It doesn't work that way. It takes time to evaluate and consider his findings. You can't see the truth of these observations because you were on the offensive. You were ready and waiting to attack the first thing he wrote that you didn't like. I hope you reconsider and give this work a chance. It is not just the discovery on death that is most important, although it was father's favorite. It is the knowledge of how to prevent from coming back that for which BLAME AND PUNISHMENT were previously necessary AS PART OF OUR DEVELOPMENT. I don't know how to express this any other way without virtually shaking you. I can't do anymore than I have done. I am going to try to set up a forum where people can be part of this movement. Maybe you will join me. Who knows. I just want to thank everyone for their time and commitment to this very important thread and endeavor, even if you are dubious as to the genuineness of this knowledge. I forgive you.  |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
You seem to have made another spelling error. What's up with that? Don't worry, I think I can decipher it.
|
What spelling error did you find that is so important to have brought up?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Good luck with your forum for people who want to join the movement. Let me know if it starts to generate some traffic: then maybe I can join in and all you guys can have fun explaining to each other how biased I am. It would be utterly fascinating to talk to people who think this book makes sense.
Maybe you can just make people re-read the book until they agree, as you seem hell-bent on trying to do with me. It could very well work: being forced to read that eye-watering prose for more than a few times would make me endorse Mein Kampf, if that is what it took. It is an approach that seems to work well for Scientologists, anyway. They equate disagreement with lack of understanding too.
|
I'm not even asking you to read anything. I'm asking you to listen to the audio. It will help you to see that you have understood very little in spite of how long I've been here. Don't give me this stuff about Mein Kampf, as if to say that you already know everything there is to know. How can you endorse something you know very little about? In regard to this discovery, it is absolutely true that disagreeing is equivalent to lack of understanding. If you disagree with one plus one equals two, it's because you don't understand it. The same holds true here.