Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I am not going to answer you because...
|
Because you're a dishonest lying weasel without a shred of integrity, apparently. You have no excuse for not answering this post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
...your entire list of choices is based on photons traveling.
|
That is a plain lie, and shows you haven't even read the post. The list of choices is NOT based on photons traveling (not that you even disagree with that anyway!). Traveling photons is only one of four possible options, and the post
proves that there are no further options beyond these.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
The photons obviously are coming from a light source or an object that is reflecting that light.
|
The only light source in the scenario is the Sun. So how do these photons get from the Sun to the film/retina on Earth without teleporting and without traveling there? You don't know, do you? You have absolutely no fucking idea how any of this is supposed to work!
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You keep asking me where did the photons come from which shows me you have failed to understand the efferent account even the slightest...
|
That you cannot answer that question without contradicting yourself shows that YOU don't understand the efferent account in the slightest. The post you just refused to answer proves that the light cannot have come from the Sun if it doesn't travel or teleport to the film/retina.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
...asking me where the same question over and over again doesn't even apply in this model...
|
Again, as long as you say light will be at the retina, the question of where that light came from and how it got there certainly DOES apply.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
...because TIME is not involved when you are looking from inside out through the eyes, not from the outside in.
|
Weasel. Cameras don't have eyes and cannot look outwards, yet you need to explain the same problem for photography, so this answer does not work. Also, you need to SHOW, and not just claim, that time will not be involved. That is what you cannot do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You're a broken record because you will not even try to grasp the mechanism behind efferent vision...
|
You have yet to postulate any mechanism for how the light gets from the Sun to the film/retina. Doing so without any time involved is either faster-than-light travel or teleportation
by definition. You have no mechanism.
