Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
|
There IS a mechanism. Lessans describes how the brain and eyes work in relation to light
|
No he didn't. He never once said a single word about light being located "at the retina" or on camera film. That's all you.
Quote:
|
You are wrong LadyShea. There is nothing that changes except that we see in real time.
|
And that light can be located somewhere without any explanation of how it is there.
And that only white light travels, and reflected light does something else entirely...hangs around objects waiting for us to direct our gaze at it, apparently. |
No, it does not do something apparently different. Light is where it is as it travels through space/time. I have told you countless times (how many more times do I have to repeat this?) that the properties of light don't change. He made a discovery regarding the EYES, NOT LIGHT. WHY ARE YOU INSISTENT ON DISMISSING THIS? You are assuming the light is bringing the image to the brain, however you want to word it. This is the antithesis of the model I am sharing, so why can't you admit that you keep going back to "the image is in the light", which is the afferent position. Why can't you admit this?