Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
we need to focus our attention on the eyes and brain.
|
If we do that you can't explain cameras, which is where the topic of light and its location came from.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Focusing on traveling photons is not going to disprove this model because it is starting out with the afferent perspective that light has to reach Earth first to utilize that light to see. I know you haven't grasped how it is possible to see matter instantly without light having to reach Earth, but that doesn't mean your lack of understanding at this point makes it impossible.
|
Even if I accepted it for arguments sake about the eyes, it
is completely
impossible for cameras.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I am not interested in talking about photons because it is diverting attention away from where his observations originated.
|
His "observations" completely ignored cameras,
which require the immediate physical presence of photons on the surface of film or a sensor in order to work, meaning it was not a well thought out idea with regards to optics. That's the problem you are stuck with.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
if the camera is within optical range of the object, it works in the same way as the eyes.
|
How can a camera work the same as eyes, if Lessans was correct and the eyes are merely windows for the brain to look through? Seriously, think about Lessans
exact words, and try to apply them to a camera. It cannot be done.