06-10-2014, 12:56 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Bump
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
right back to the same question over and over and over again regarding traveling photons. It doesn't even apply in this account, which is why I can't answer you. I'm not ignoring you and I"m not weaseling. I can't fit your thought system into mine. They are mutually exclusive.
|
Then you need to abandon the claim that light photons are physically located at the retina and on camera film in efferent vision (which Lessans didn't believe and never mentioned), and especially in the case of the Sun on at noon scenario, or you need to account for how light is located there and where it came from without changing the known properties of light and laws of physics.
"Eyes and brain" doesn't explain cameras. and neither does this:
Quote:
|
No they don't, but if the camera is within optical range of the object, it works in the same way as the eyes. It just produces the image on film in real time instead of our eyes seeing the object in real time.
|
According to this statement, the brain is irrelevant to seeing. But Lessans thought it was the most important thing...in fact he said we wouldn't see anything with our eyes without the stimulation of our brain from the other senses. How does a camera fit into that at all?
Then you go right back to the brain, which doesn't explain cameras
Quote:
|
The fact that the object has to be within our field of view, along with the brain looking through the eyes to see that object, creates a closed system
|
How does that fit with a camera?
As long as you make these contradictory and nonsensical claims, you are going to be challenged to explain and defend them, which you can't. |
|