Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LadyShea
That is magic. You have offered no physical mechanism to physically get light to camera film or retina on Earth. Light cannot be 'at' somewhere it hasn't traveled to.
|
You are still talking about the information being in the light whether the object is in range or not. Why don't you even acknowledge what I'm saying? It's like everything I say bounces right off of you without even digesting the words. |
I didn't say a single word about information, I am talking only about the physical location of physically existing light that has physical properties that your model is not explaining and is incompatible with. |
I give up. You have ignored this entire concept without realizing it. You have determinedly tried to prove Lessans wrong with knowledge about physics that is not being challenged or in violation.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LadyShea
You are very obviously the one who is not reading what I am writing, since you are responding to points I haven't even made, and utterly failing to address the points I have made.
|
I know the points you've made. I've heard them for 3 years, and nothing you are saying negates the truth of efferent vision. All you are doing is talking about traveling photons. You are missing the entire concept that there is no information (no image) that can be found in a photon that travels to Earth, therefore we would never see any past image because that's not what light does. It brings nothing through space/time. It only reveals. I cannot explain this any better. You may be one of those people who will never understand this. Your lack of understanding does not make his claim wrong.