Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
You are arguing it. You said "we will never get an image of any bit of matter that is not within our visual range", which is exactly what the Hubble does and Spacemonkey pointed out to you. The galaxies and nebulae and other images captured by the Hubble are part of the external world and contain substance, but they are not at all within our "visual range"
|
The Hubble telescope captures light, but it does not capture images that are of a material nature. Images are not reflected, remember? I stand by this, and you have not been able to refute it as hard as you are trying since you think I'm an underling. I know you LadyShea. You put yourself on some kind of pedestal where you don't belong. Where does what I claim contradict or negate anything that has been posited on Lessans' behalf? |
No-one says that images are reflected, remember? We are saying that Hubble forms images of material objects outside our visual range from nothing but arriving light, which is exactly what you denied to be possible.