Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
The fact that you actually think I'm saying that light travels to Earth in a nanosecond is hilarious.
|
That's what you keep saying, that light will be located on camera film in a nanosecond. The film is on Earth which is 93 million miles from the Sun. These are just facts. |
But not if the image or information is not traveling LadyShea. |
That's irrelevant to the issue and nobody thinks images travel.
Light travels, and you have stated that
light will be at camera film in a nanosecond.
That is what violates the laws of physics.
Quote:
|
That's the problem with the afferent viewpoint. It is believed that the image or information or raw material is in the light which is then transduced.
|
It is known that some light strikes the eye as the eye gets in its path of travel. You've agreed that this happens. Light has information as part of its properties, information you've agreed exists.
Quote:
|
The whole concocted story is not right.
|
Yet you agree that light travels, and you agree that light has information, such as wavelength, intensity, direction and angle of travel etc. So the only part you can possibly think is concocted is that the photoreceptors can use that information to send signals to the brain...which is something the body is fully capable of as you also agree the other senses do this.
So what aspect is so far fetched?