Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger
Why do we detect neutrinos from supernova explosions at roughly the same time that we detect the light, even though, according to Lessans, we should see the light thousands or even millions of years before the neutrinos arrive? Apparently, some mysterious force causes stars to emit a burst of neutrinos (in violation of all know stellar physics, by the way) such that its arrival will coincide with the star's explosion, as seen from Earth.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
No, I corrected that. Seeing only light would be the same time we would see neutrinos which is in delayed time. This does not contradict real time vision one bit. Another oops!
|
Except Lessans said we see distant stars, of which only their light is visible, in "no time at all", not in delayed time. He also said we would see the Sun's explosion in real time...so why would see distant stars exploding in delayed time? |
Only because the Sun is close enough to us that we would be able to see the real thing (the ball of fire), not just the light.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Do you disagree with Lessans?
|
In keeping with this account, all that means is that our telescopes would see this light striking our telescopes in the present. This is something that even belligerent David could accept. But this has nothing to do with seeing the real world in real time due to light's presence. The very function of light is to be the bridge between the internal and external worlds. The external world does not enter our brains through light which then gets interpreted. I can't see light that hasn't arrived, that is true, which Lessans never disputed.