View Single Post
  #47426  
Old 07-10-2016, 06:47 PM
davidm's Avatar
davidm davidm is offline
Spiffiest wanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MXCXCVI
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peacegirl
Light has many different hues. This information is in the light, but to say that light bounces of objects and takes that information through space/time is erroneous, if Lessans is right. You can argue that his claim is wrong. At least you aren't shutting him out. Until we know the truth, every sincere claim should be on the table.
But we just did that: light from visible stars comes in at the same angle as the visible stars. So now we know the truth: sight is not instant. If it wasn't, then light would have to curve towards every observer... everywhere in the universe, simultaneously, to create the illusion that it is not. That is not just extremely unlikely, it is completely impossible.
Light coming from a star is delayed, just like light coming from the Sun would be delayed by 8 1/2 minutes if it was just turned on. No one is disputing this.
Right, which means that in the case of the sun, for example, we have to wait 8.5 minutes for the light to reach our eyes, which means we are seeing an image of the sun as it was 8.5 minutes in the past. The farther away the object, the farther into the past we see. In the case of the Andromeda galaxy, it takes light 2.5 million years to reach our eyes. So, when we see the galaxy, we are seeing an image of it as it was 2.5 million years ago.

Have you finally got it? This elementary subject that people have been teaching you for 15 years on the Internet, which kindergartners can grasp in about one minute?
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Angakuk (07-12-2016), But (07-10-2016), The Lone Ranger (07-10-2016), The Man (07-10-2016)
 
Page generated in 0.41619 seconds with 10 queries