Re: A revolution in thought
It is very confusing. On the one hand we now know that there is "a huge genetic component", so that makes the statement "98% of homo-sexual intercourse comes into existence only because boys and girls are denied the opportunity to indulge with the opposite sex and fall in love" counterfactual: nothing about the new system is going to change anyone's genetic make-up.
But on the other hand PG does not disagree with the statement (as the author perceived it), but just felt it would be a bit of a can of worms, and that is why she left it out.
Peacegirl, you seem to both agree and disagree with a statement here. Do you find that happens to you often?
|