Re: Bush set to mollify religious conservatives today
If you think the wisdom that informs your Limbaughesque platitudes is a reliable indicator of how a judge will rule after he arrives on the Supreme Court, you are nearly as much a fool as the lawyer who takes herself on as a client. You're committing precisely the same error you deride in the Souter and O'Connor appointments.
As for your repeated GOP talking point references to the Supreme Court as a "legislature," you should be aware that the Thomas side of the Court has invalidated far more federal statutes than the Breyer side.
Are you sure you know what you're talking about at all? That you do is a fact not in evidence, that's for sure.
|