Re: 4th Amendment question
Incidentally no researching was to have been allowed. What I was (and am) looking for is simply a literal, "textualist" reading of the Amendment. Remember, there's no requirement in the Constitution that judges of the Supreme Court be trained as lawyers.
Why do people think that the searches and seizures referred to in the Warrants Clause are not the same searches and seizures in the Unreasonableness Clause? Are they not the same subjects of the same sentence (that's grammatical sentence, not penal sentence)?
|