Quote:
|
Originally Posted by viscousmemories
The way it's written it genuinely reads like two separate statements to me: One about an individual's right to be secure from unreasonable search and seizure, the second about the requirements for any warrants that entail search and seizure.
|
It read that way to me too, but even before reading about the history of it the simple "and" joining the sentences seemed wrong to me, like the actual conjunction which made the sentences make sense together was missing.
Lo an behold, it is.