View Single Post
  #9  
Old 11-15-2005, 07:16 PM
alphamale's Avatar
alphamale alphamale is offline
Banned for Spam
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: MCMXCVII
Default Re: Mote tort outrages

Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Scarlatti
Sadly, alphamale hasn't provided any of the dispositions to any of the cases. I could sue alphamale for the tort of intentional infliction of mental distress (in fact I could make it a class action). Of course that means nothing, since something like 97% of civil actions that come across attorneys' desks are settled, in a variety of ways, prior to trial.

What alphamale is doing is extrapolating a handful of questionably reported complaints culled from ill-informed weblogs to make global assertions that are, for all intents and purposes, completely baseless, not to mention downright stupid.

If deliberate ignorance was an individual tort - and it is an element of certain torts - there's no doubt a reasonable jury could find alphamale guilty based on a preponderance of the evidence.
Yeah, and you guys response to my items is mostly "Duh, that was from the Anti-Tort Association! Duh!" :D Don't argue if your gonna lose!
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.27759 seconds with 10 queries