Thread: Climategate 2.0
View Single Post
  #1431  
Old 01-26-2023, 03:23 AM
-FX-'s Avatar
-FX- -FX- is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: In your head
Gender: Male
Posts: MMCCCLXXII
Blog Entries: 1
News Re: Climategate 2.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevlar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by -FX- View Post
If metric was the way to go, then time would be metric. Having one system for mass/space, but a different one for time, is ridiculous.
How about an atomic clock? Just like other metric systems of measurement, it's based on a repeatable scientific process instead of a arbitrary unit of measurement.
The problem with both time and space being defined by a "repeatable process", is that neither process used, for time or distance, are repeatable in any sense of the word.

If a second is formally defined as "9,192,631,770 vibrations of the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium-133 atom" (this is the SI definition)

And a meter is formally defined as the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum in 1/299792458 of a second, (it is), then how fast can your car go?

Nobody, even the scientists running the atomic clocks can actually repeat the process so that they can say. While almost anybody can measure the speed of a car, in miles and hours.
__________________
"Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, "Is it reasonable?""

- Richard P. Feynman
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.26043 seconds with 10 queries