Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
From the first thread (where it was ignored):
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
If you can present and explain his first discovery in your own words, then I'll discuss it with you. But but there's really no point. His first 'discovery' depends upon unsupported empirical assumptions about conscience which you cannot evidentially support any more than his ridiculous ideas about vision. You'll just find yourself in exactly the same position, insisting that his assumptions were based on very accurate 'observations' which you are nevertheless unable to present or describe, and believe to have existed based on nothing more than your own unshakeable faith in Lessans' abilities.
|
|
The more I hear about this, or rather "don't hear" about it, the more I think it's some serious bullshit.
Nor random bullshit, not mean spirited bullshit, not trickery or deceptive bullshit, but some serious bullshit.