Quote:
|
Originally Posted by viscousmemories
Okay Cool Hand, I see what you're saying and I agree. I only meant that it seemed that despite the obvious slant of many of the statements I didn't see any that were plainly non-factual. But yeah I think the examples you've provided make your case well.
|
I vigorously disagree.
1. No fact exists independent of a theory/explanatory context. This is perfectly acceptable journalism.
2. Despite a couple of dubious choices of phrase, the facts are indeed facts and the opinion is thoroughly justifiable.
All blow-by-blow details to be supplied tomorrow (in my time zone, actually, later today).