Quote:
|
Originally Posted by D. Scarlatti
But "in" can also be interpreted in a functional sense; i.e., was the purpose of the statement to further a compromise? The functional view is likely to be used by courts that have interpreted compromise negotiations to refer to a state of mind rather than an event.
|
My first thought was "so it depends on what your definition of 'is' is?" but that's actually a fascinating point.