View Single Post
  #19  
Old 06-19-2006, 03:25 AM
Javaman's Avatar
Javaman Javaman is offline
Wildcard!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A Plain(s) State
Gender: Male
Posts: MCCCXXI
Default Re: Federal Appeals Court Upholds Constitutionality Of Ten Commandments Display

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk
There you go again. You are practically a walking advertisement for black & white thinking.
You do not know me very well. If I have a single thought here it is that dividing Americans is bad. Dividing people in general is bad when they fight over such matters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk
Point 1. Most, if not all, of the displays in question were donated, not provided for by public funds.
But are maintained by them. I know, there is one in my town donated by the FoE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk
Point 2. Insisting on the removal of those displays which meet the Supreme Court's conditions is an act of advocacy on behalf of a particular belief. That belief being that any display of or reference to the 10 Commandments is de facto an endorsement of a religious belief. Effectively, you are conceding that the display of the 10 Commandments necessarily means what those who advocate position #1 intend it to mean.
You are using 'belief' in two decidedly different ways here. Again, I don't want my beliefs pushed on anyone! Do you get told much that you shouldn't believe in a god? See many athiest shows on TV? What is the benefit of posting divisive materials in government building and on publicly-funded property? Why is this good and fair - or do you not care?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk
Point 3. I agree that there is a delicious irony in the preoccupation displayed, by a certain variety of Christian, for the public display of the 10 Commandments. But, as you say, that discussion probably belongs in another thread.
I've participated in a few of those discussions already and they are interesing to say the least. Perhaps I'll start one tomorrow as I'll soon be off to bed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk
Point 4. While I agree that #1 is false, you are going to have to work harder to demonstrate to me that #2 is true. It's a classic example of a bifurcation fallacy. It is not necessarily the case that either position is true. Unless, of course, you are addicted to thinking exclusively in black & white terms. Then there are always only two options and one must be true and the other false.
At the very least, the appearance of an endorsement is there. Does the Hindu feel he will get fair treatment in a courthouse with the 10C's posted? Gotta sleep.
__________________
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.16951 seconds with 10 queries