Quote:
|
Originally Posted by D. Scarlatti
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wholly Goats
Can you then tell me why it can't, or shouldn't, be used as in the instance proposed in the case of Justice Souter's New Hampshire home?
|
Because that is textbook frivolousness, barely reasonable and purely designed for harassment. |
Excuse me, but it was indeed frivolous, but eminently reasonable. Would not Justice Souter's home provide a greater public benefit as a hotel than as his private home? The same arguments apply here as to condemning private property in New London for the building of a shopping center. It was designed to make a point, and I think it made it quite well.
And when was the last time a public road was turned over to a private for-profit organization to raise revenue? Can you cite me a real example?