Quote:
|
Originally Posted by livius drusus
I don't see how it could by any standard be considered kiddie porn unless the bar was set so low plain nudity counted. A pedophile would like to look at any pic of a child, I'm sure, so I don't think that's a reasonable standard either. I mean, it's a good reason to keep those kinds of pics very private (let me know if you ever want them deleted, dave), but not a good legal standard at all.
|
From an article
here about a guy in Canada who was accused:
Quote:
|
When Minsk asked what was considered appropriate behaviour, the counsellor said nude pictures of children over 2 were taboo unless they were pictured in the bathroom or in a pool. The living room was out. "They were talking about a boundary", Minsk says, "but nobody convinced me that what I did was wrong".
|
Kind of scary, huh?