[QUOTE=yguy]No, I'm saying they had to invade in order to attack.
If I recall correctly, the 19 hijackers came here legally...no invasion necessary.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yguy
No more than that is necessary, since the potential for destruction is comparable to that from an invasion as traditionally defined.
|
The clause doesn't say anything about "potential"
invasion or rebellion, much less terrorist activity.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yguy
Or, your definition of "invasion" stretches credibility.
|
Um, no. The terror attack was not an "invasion" any more than the
Vinnie Vincent Invasion was...and they even called themselves by the term (and were almost as big of a disaster).
By your definition, the entrance of a single alien, lawful or unlawful, who harboted some criminal intent, would be sufficient to suspend the Great Writ. That's a slippery slope I would rather not go down.