I saw a rerun of Frontline the other night that discussed the ever-expanding range of methamphetamine. It's a little out of date (the program debuted in February 2006), but still very much relevant, especially in its treatment of the history of the drug's production.
You can watch the program
here, and read the riveting series in
The Oregonian which is the foundation of the episode
here.
The Oregonian calls the meth epidemic an "unnecessary" one, because as with
quaaludes, a particular chemical is required to produce the drug. You can't just grow it like coca or opium poppies, so if you kill production of the chemical, you kill the drug.
Gene Haislip, number 3 guy at the DEA during the 80's was interviewed for the program. He thinks the epidemic could have been stopped in its tracks back then had ephedrine and pseudoephedrine been banned. The pharmaceutical industry and their government shills (including himself at one point, he freely admits) got in the way.
Today I read in the NYT that meth is expanding its foothold in Europe now too, spreading out from the Czech Republic. No superlabs there, apparently, but huge numbers of small cook operations entirely dependent on over the counter cold medicine purchases.
Europe Fears That Meth Foothold Is Expanding
Generally speaking I'm in favor of drug decriminalization/legalization, but at this point, I can't tell you how much I'd prefer the production of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine were regulated into quaalude-irrelevance rather than the
ugliness of meth continue to spread.