View Single Post
  #11  
Old 04-09-2005, 12:57 AM
maddog maddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: MMMXXXVIII
Default Re: Good, common sense, anti-crime issue!

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Carter
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddog
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Carter
As it also says in the article linked, this is the way it already is in most parts of the US.
And therefore wholly unnecessary. Except to give the impression, as lunachick says, that "you can kill anyone now - just say that you felt threatened or whatever and w[ere] simply doing what you had to do." That it was the brain-child of the NRA should tell you something.
It still sounds like hysteria to me. Also, resorting to ad hominem fallacies does not help you convince me that you have a solid argument.
Well, it just seems to me that if the extant law already says that it is permissible to meet deadly force with deadly force, and it already says it is permissible to meet force with force, what is the need for this law? Why would anyone promote it? What is its purpose? We don't presume that the Legislature is performing idle acts. Whose ox is going to be gored?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnCarter
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddog
Maybe it *should* but in my experience, it doesn't. When people are "packing," they tend to USE those guns. Statutes like this one make people feel more "justified" in resorting to the guns they're carrying. I've seen it so many, many, many times, that guns are used impulsively, with deadly consequences, and often tragic results for the citizen-user, who then must face a criminal trial.
In your experience? How much experience do you have with people who habitually carry weapons? In my own experience, I know nobody who does so that has used a weapon impulsively. So we have two opposing sets of anecdotal evidence, together with a slippery slope fallacy.
I've seen things like this a lot in 25 years of reviewing criminal (and civil) appeals (and, in the course of research, reading hundreds, if not thousands of other cases). The testimony of the people who just "lost it" and reacted is quite common -- "it happened so fast" "I did it without thinking" "I don't remember what I did, I was so scared/angry" etc. And you don't have to carry weapons "habitually" to have bad things happen.

#408
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.17854 seconds with 10 queries