Quote:
Originally Posted by yguy
Getting the idea across to an atheist is problematic, but I'll give it a go: I think Reagan was self-motivated. He would never have drunk in the adulation of the masses the way Obama (pbuh) does.
Also it's worth noting that before 1945, Russia, Germany and Japan were led by cult figures. I think it not coincidental that two of those powers were responsible for most of the atrocities during that period. I think that in the minds of their underlings, those living icons displaced their consciences, making all things acceptable which were approved by said icons.
And speaking of conscience, I guess that's the secular answer to your question.
But if all that leaves you cold, do you actually find nothing wrong with being motivated by another person?
|
I am somewhat confused by parts of your answer. You say that "[g]etting the idea across to an atheist is problematic." Is this because belief in a deity is a necessary component of appropriately-sourced motivation and therefore beyond an athiest's comprehension, or is it because the idea is difficult to explain except through use of non-secular terminology? Then you propose that the idea of 'conscience' is the "secular answer" to my question. So, you seem to be saying that the appropriate source for motivation is something internal or spiritual. Is this correct?
To answer your question, no, I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with one person being motivated by another. If the result is that one person is inspired to improve him or herself, I see that as a good thing.