Quote:
Originally Posted by Michali
Seebs. Let's close our argument. I'll quote wikipedia.
The function of the input is always the function of the output. I'm sure you'll agree.
|
I don't even know what you think you said.
Imagine f(x) = x+1.
f(1) = 2.
f(2) = 3.
f(3) = 4.
You seem to be arguing that, therefore, f(1) = 4, because it'd happen eventually.
This is not how functions work.
Quote:
|
Now that you know you are completely wrong, how ridiculous did I sound? I didn't even research until now.
|
You still sound totally ridiculous to me. I don't think you understand one of these words. I can't tell which one.
But the sequence of words "the function of the input is always the function of the output"
does not mean a fucking thing. It's not even coherent. It's just words strung together.