[Sweetie]

Originally Posted by Adora

So working to change attittudes in society so both parents share parenting and household chores to encourage a happier and more equal home-life is detremental to the family?

I really don't understand how you only have stuff like this to offer and still consider yourself superior, seriously. What planet are you on?

My husband cooks. He's gone three weeks a month but he enjoys cooking and he always did for instance, when he's home and not exhausted. He cleans, if I'm not up to par or need a break if he has the priveledge of being home, he takes care of things. He hates dishes but he'll do 'em and he hates laundry but he'll do 'em if he really, really has to.

In my house parenting and household chores already equalized according to the amount one has to work outside the home.

Where does feminism come in in all of this?

Who are you blaming that this isn't the case in your la la land? Who's fault is it that it is that way?

Even gay porn?

I'm against all porn so it's simple, yes it objectifies all people but women moreso.

Originally Posted by Sweetie

It is if the society around them including the government encourage such sexism.

Really?

Well, interesting. It's the government's fault that my husband won't do laundry.

Put it this way, I wouldn't date a guy who wouldn't get up and help out around the house and I sure as hell wouldn't have kids with one if I was just to be wifey.

And yet they both share the same problem of almost exactly the same levels of domestic violence. Funny that.

Right, so you perhaps have falsly named your enemy then, correct?

Besides, isn't female physical violence on the rise?

*snorts* Yeah, well, when you do, give us a call. Considering Tommy Douglas was a socialist, I think you're talking shit.

Good Lord, at least I'd be in good company.

Seriously, are people over there all like you? You guys actually desire to sleep with each other if the men are pigs and the women are snotty bitches like you?

Why would it be really stupid? Equal representation for equal population.

Equal representation requires the actual physical presence of a woman? Weren't you just bitching about females being misogynists before? Therefore what? If you think really, really hard I'm sure you could see what's in there waiting for you............the falsification of your ideas or indication of their irrelevancy.

No, it's because those in power, who are men, are extending their influence to where it should not be, and interfereing with the democratic process of other countries, and more importantly, the lives of women who they should have no power over.

Mmmhmm.

The Uruguayan example is not a conspiracy theory. Look it up, bitch. Nor are the facts of the Global Gag Rule, if you bothered to educate yourself.

I really think you missed the part where I determined that it's irrelevant.

The deaths of women around the world because of an anti-woman government refusing to save their lives because of conservatism and backward religious values are facts, which you are chosing to be anti-life towards and ignore.

Oh goodness.

So before you start using such a phrase, maybe you should reconsider your own stance on whose life is more important - your own cushy one living happily in denial of the reality around the world, or those of women dying because of a Superpower government.

Holy Fuck. I and all men and all religions are resposible for the big enemy, America. *oohhs and ahhhs*

Why does there have to be some lines? If you have "not time for feminism", supposedly, why do you care how they define themselves, and what causes they support?

Geez, is your brilliance this obvious to everyone?

Indeed we do. But see Sweetie, usually lines are drawn by people who actually have some knowledge of what they're talking about. Not people who "have no time" for that thing which they are making lame attempts to define.

You keep using this "have no time" line. I never said I had no time for feminism if that's supposed to be intended as some sort of cheap shot.