Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I am being confronted and challenged at every turn, which is understandable. I'm only trying to defend this knowledge (by showing that no proven technology needs afferent vision to be true for it to work) until further evidence comes in. I do not see where I'm being unreasonable or irrational.
|
You are not "showing" anything, you are refusing to demonstrate you even understand the challenges, refusing the look at the evidence that already exists, changing or dismissing definitions, weaseling, and handwaving the examples away with nonsense.