[peacegirl]

And so is a preponderance of evidence in a court of law that often puts an innocent person in prison for life.

Originally Posted by LadyShea

Yep, it's not perfect, but we can't have perfect because there are too many factors.

Regardless of the number of factors involved, the point being made is that a preponderance of evidence does not always give us the right answers.

So at this point there is no reason for me to refute what you believe gives "undisputed evidence" that the brain reconstructs an image from the neurons that are coming from the optic nerve.

Originally Posted by LadyShea

I didn't say undisputed evidence at all, I said "clear" evidence. I also posted a video made from a similar experiment on humans. Two very easy for anyone to see sets of findings that I find quite convincing, myself.

You said this:

Originally Posted by LadyShea
As for absolute proof, how many times have we had to tell you that proof is not used in science nor is it something most of us science minded folks even consider possible let alone seek? Evidence, a preponderance of evidence, all current evidence, so far undisputed evidence, etc. are all acceptable terms.

I don't even see where you used the phrase "clear" evidence. The evidence does seem convincing, but it is not conclusive. People treat me as if I'm a leper because I am waiting for more conclusive tests to be run. It's easy for you because you have everyone on your side. I don't, but that just makes me more determined to find out the truth.