Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
No, this proves that for sight to occur, light only needs to be present at the object, not at the eye.
Making a difference between cameras and eyes even more obvious. A difference we do not observe in reality.
|
You're trying to make an artificial distinction between how a camera works and how an eye works, but it's not working.  |
I refer you back to the red/blue thought experiment, where a camera would observe something different from the eye, unless cameras are also efferent. We know they are not.
It is really very simple.