Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedoc
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
The mechanism as to how it all works is a theory. It is not proven David, and you know it. .
|
One more time, a 'Scientific Theory' is knowledge that has been tested and proven, and the theory of sight as 'afferent vision' is a tested and proven scientific theory. |
They think it's been proven, but now it's being challenged. |
By who? By you?
The woman who thinks photons give off photons?
|
You're just looking for a red herring to distract people. It doesn't surprise me. |
Yes, I desperately need a red herring to distract the discerning readers from your gargantuan idiocies. |
David, your answers don't say anything except to show that you are angry at someone who says science, in this instance, might be wrong. That's unfortunate because your anger will not allow you to see anything that contradicts your beliefs. |
No, peacegirl, my responses to what you write stem from the fact that you are a dishonest, contemptible little shit who knows absolutely nothing about science, yet you presume to lecture others on what is real. Once again, the only one who has a personal stake in the outcome of scientific findings is you. You desperately need to believe that your father was some kind of God, whereas in fact he was a buffoon. And so are you.  |
There you go again showing everyone how invested you are in your sacred worldview. The more you open your mouth the easier it is to see why you are so reactive. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting weary of the same old emotional baggage you're bringing to this discussion in the name of objectivity.